Who you are is determined in part by your name and physical description, but that is only a small portion of you--other parts contribution to the whole being, which consists of mind, body, soul, maybe more.
We are all created by the sum of our experiences as well, beyond genetics. The nature versus nurture conventional argument is put to the test and comes out time and again to show that both play a role, without doubt. Who we are is the experiences that the world and its inhabitants have placed in our paths, either directly or indirectly. Therefore we are a part of the world, and it is a part of us.We are connected.
John Donne wrote these words in 1624, as a part of a larger work entitled Devotions upon Emergent Occasions:
No man is an island, entire of itself
every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main
if a clod be washed away by the sea,
Europe is the less, as well as if a promontory were,
as well as if a manor of thy friends or of thine own were
any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind
and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls
it tolls for thee. I think it is amazing that John Donne created two essentiallyeverlasting quotations with those words ("No man is an island,entire of itself" and " never send to know for whom the belltolls it tolls for thee"). I feel the truth in his words, despite thefact that my mind as easily finds arguments against as for theconcept. Evocative of the essence of life, the words haveretained their fame through almost 400 years! Beyond randomosity,there lies a land of truths, many of which can be grasped bytraveling through the realm of randomosity. When I was a child, my grandmother had a set of 1958 WorldBook Encyclopedias with which I spent many long hours. Iloved the idea of all that knowledge! In the introduction to the 1958 edition of the World Book Encyclopedia, there wasa scenario described that was something like this: "Imagine a screen with all the knowledge that exists on it, in a darkened theater. The screen can only be illuminated with yourflashlight, which shows only a little of that knowledge at a time."That was approximately how it began, but I really would loveto find that quotation, or another set of 1958 World BookEncyclopedias! I can't remember the whole thing, or the exact wording of that first part, really. I just remember how entirely enlightening I found that introductory passage. It made me wantto know, well, everything! Now, I don't just want to know everything. I desire to understandthe inner workings and the outward connections that run from every concept and object in existence to all others. It is not aboutwhether the items or ideas are a part of each other, but how andwhere they both fit into the giant screen of life.
No comments:
Post a Comment